Results of a patient survey using an online questionnaire after implant removal for breast implant illness.

The use of silicone breast implants has a history of over 60 years. In recent years, specific health issues among implant wearers have repeatedly come into focus. The term "breast implant illness" has been circulating in scientific literature and on social media for several years. It describes a cluster of up to 60 different symptoms. The present results of an online survey conducted within a clinic's patient population of the last 8 years show, among other things, the evolution of 8 reported symptoms before and after breast implant removal. In the comparison before and after, there is a significant reduction in the intensity of symptoms after implant removal. A causal relationship with the removal of the implants is to be presumed.

Altered Foreign Body Response at the Posterior Surface Compared to the Anterior Surface of Human Silicone Breast Implants.

Soft implantable devices are crucial to optimizing form and function for many patients. However, periprosthetic capsule fibrosis is one of the major challenges limiting the use of implants. Currently, little is understood about how spatial and temporal factors influence capsule physiology and how the local capsule environment affects the implant structure. In this work, we analyzed breast implant capsule specimens with staining, immunohistochemistry, and real-time polymerase chain reaction to investigate spatiotemporal differences in inflammation and fibrosis. We demonstrated that in comparison to the anterior capsule against the convex surface of breast implants, the posterior capsule against the flat surface of the breast implant displays several features of a dysregulated foreign body reaction including increased capsule thickness, abnormal extracellular remodeling, and infiltration of macrophages. Furthermore, the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines increased in the posterior capsule across the lifespan of the device, but not in the anterior capsule. We also analyzed the surface oxidation of breast explant samples with XPS analysis. No significant differences in surface oxidation were identified either spatially or temporally. Collectively, our results support spatiotemporal heterogeneity in inflammation and fibrosis within the breast implant capsule. These findings presented here provide a more detailed picture of the complexity of the foreign body reaction surrounding implants destined for human use and could lead to key research avenues and clinical applications to treat periprosthetic fibrosis and improve device longevity.

Unveiling the Enigma: Exploring capsular contracture-Unraveling its link with autoimmune disorders and comprehensive examination of predisposing factors.

Introduction: Breast augmentation, a popular cosmetic surgery using devices like silicone implants, can lead to a common issue called capsular contracture (CC). This condition involves the formation of fibrous tissue around the implants and can be influenced by variables like immunological and bacterial factors. This study aimed to explore the impact of autoimmune diseases (ADs) on CC along with other factors influencing future clinical decisions. Methods: A systematic review of electronic databases was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, and involving adult patients (>18) with CC and ADs after breast surgery using MeSH terminology using a broad search strategy. All searches were performed and analyzed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and duplicates were removed with Rayyan. Two independent investigators extracted and assessed the data involving demographics and baseline data related to CC and AD. Results: The incidence of CC varied (2.3%-4.1%). Subglandular placement and older device age raised risk. SERI Surgical Scaffold complications included necrosis, seroma, hematoma, implant loss, and infection; CC was associated with necrosis. Natrelle 410 implants showed lower 10-year CC risk than round gel implants. Acellular dermal matrix implant-based breast reconstruction with radiotherapy (RT) correlated with 20.7% post-RT CC. Previous research demonstrated no significant connection between silicone gel implants and ADs. Biofilm, surgical site infection, implant features, and interventions emerged as frequent CC risk factors. Conclusion: Finding appropriate techniques to reduce the risk factors associated with CC together with providing comprehensive patient counseling on these factors will definitely improve the patient-centered outcome of breast implant surgery.

Testing Mechanical Properties of Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants and Their Degradation.

Breast augmentation procedures using silicone implants have become increasingly popular over the past six decades. This article addresses the concerns of patients regarding implant strength by providing clinicians with valuable information in addition to video and pictorial evidence to share, fostering reassurance. The article focuses on the structural integrity and stability of breast implants, which play a critical role in their long-term performance and patient satisfaction. Specifically, it examines the industry standards outlined by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), with a particular emphasis on ISO14607-2018, which encompasses a range of mechanical and physio-mechanical tests, including the assessment of silicone gel-fill firmness, evaluation of shell integrity, and examination of the impact of environmental conditions on implant performance. Breast implants are not static devices and are subject to aging and fatigue-based degradation. This emphasizes the need for ongoing monitoring and evaluation to ensure the long-term safety and satisfaction of patients. By providing a comprehensive examination of breast implant structure and industry standards, this article equips clinicians with the necessary knowledge to address patient concerns and foster confidence in the safety and longevity of breast augmentation procedures using silicone implants.Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Technical Refinements for Reducing Reoperations in Single-Stage Augmentation Mastopexy: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The goals of mastopexy differ significantly from those of augmentation mammoplasty. Mastopexy is designed to lift and reshape the breasts, while augmentation mammoplasty is designed to increase the volume of the breasts. This conflict causes that one-stage augmentation mastopexies showed a revision rate from 8.7 to 23.2%. The aim of our study is to present some technical refinements for reducing the risk of implant exposure and reoperation. METHODS: We designed a retrospective matched cohort study, including 216 consecutive patients, undergone augmentation mastopexy between January 2013 and December 2022. We divided them in two groups: Group A undergone an inverted-T superomedial pedicled augmentation mastopexy and Group B undergone our inverted-T modified augmentation mastopexy. The groups were matched for clinical and surgical variables, with the surgical technique the only difference between the two. RESULTS: Complications were registered in ten patients (9.3%) in Group A (two wound breakdowns at T with implant exposure and eight wound dehiscences), six of which required surgical revision. In contrast, only three patients (2.8%) in Group B reported a complication, which was wound dehiscence without implant exposure in all cases. None of the dehiscence required surgical revision. The difference between complication and revision rates was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Separating the implant and the mastopexy dissection planes reduces the implant exposure and the reoperation rate in one-stage augmentation mastopexy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://link.springer.com/journal/00266 .

Sonographic Assessment of Breast Implants Using Strain Elastography and Shear Wave Elastography in an Animal Model.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To date, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the gold standard for diagnosing breast implant rupture. As MRI is an expensive procedure with limited availability, the improvement of sonographic assessment is desirable. A potentially useful tool in this regard is elastography. To evaluate the diagnostic benefits of strain elastography and shear wave elastography under standardized conditions we developed an animal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An animal model was created by preparing an implant site in a chicken breast, imitating tissue layers covering a breast implant after mastectomy. Different broken and intact implants were inserted. Thereby, measurements were performed using strain elastography and shear wave elastography. For strain elastography, the resulting images were investigated on repeated patterns. The data generated by shear wave elastography were analyzed for significant differences between the ruptured and intact implants. RESULTS: The animal model using chicken breast generated realistic images and measurements comparable to those of a human breast. Hence, ruptured and intact implants could be compared under standardized conditions. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between intact and ruptured implants with respect to the data generated by shear wave elastography. Qualitative analysis using strain wave elastography showed different patterns between intact and ruptured implants in the animal model. Intact implants showed a characteristic sonographic image of three layers in certain levels. CONCLUSION: Shear wave elastography does not seem to produce reliable data for the evaluation of breast implants, whereas qualitative analysis using strain elastography might be a useful tool to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Role of flow cytometric immunophenotyping in the diagnosis of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: A 6-year, single-institution experience.

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is an uncommon mature T-cell neoplasm occurring in patients with textured breast implants, typically after 7-10 years of exposure. Although cytopathologic or histopathologic assessment is considered the gold standard diagnostic method for BIA-ALCL, flow cytometry (FC)-based immunophenotyping is recommended as an adjunct test. However, the diagnostic efficacy of FC is not well reported. We reviewed 290 FC tests from breast implant pericapsular fluid and capsule tissue from 182 patients, including 16 patients with BIA-ALCL over a 6-year period, calculating diagnostic rates and test efficacy. FC showed an overall sensitivity of 75.9%, specificity of 100%, and negative and positive predictive values of 95.4% and 100%, respectively. Blinded expert review of false-negative cases identified diagnostic pitfalls, improving sensitivity to 96.6%. Fluid samples had better rates of adequate samples for FC testing compared with tissue samples. Paired with FC testing of operating room (OR)-acquired fluid samples, capsulectomy FC specimens added no diagnostic value in patients with concurrent fluid samples; no cases had positive capsule FC with negative fluid FC. Fluid samples are adequate for FC testing more often than tissue. Capsule tissue FC specimens do not improve FC efficacy when paired with OR-acquired fluid FC samples and are often inadequate samples. FC is 100% specific for BIA-ALCL and can serve as a confirmatory test but should not be the sole diagnostic method. Awareness of sample-specific diagnostic pitfalls greatly improves the sensitivity of BIA-ALCL testing by FC.

Axillary Lymphadenectomy: Safe Dissection Through a Correct Technique.

The primary treatment of breast cancer in sentinel-positive ganglia includes axillary lymphatic nodal dissection. The LAD (lymphatic axillary dissection) has decreased in overall numbers but due to the increasing incidence of breast cancer, it is practised on a daily basis, even though there is a myriad of complications such as numbness of the upper limb and chest wall, movement restriction of the upper limb, and chronic pain which appear due to trauma to the nerves which pass through the axilla. However, the utility in the overall survival or DFS (disease-free survival) of the patient is unquestionable.  In our study, through the dissection of cadavers, we exposed the vital structures and the anatomical relations of this region. We aimed to offer a map or technique for the surgeon to follow to decrease the overall morbidity of this procedure.

Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma: A Case Report about a Male Patient with Pectoral Implants.

Introduction: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is still a rare extralymphatic lymphoma. As of March 1, 2023, approximately 1,355 cases of BIA-ALCL have been reported worldwide. However, no such case has yet been described with pectoral implants in male patients. Most patients with BIA-ALCL present with nonspecific implant-associated symptoms such as late-onset seroma, swollen breasts, and deformation of implants. Case Presentation: Here, we describe BIA-ALCL in a 76-year-old male patient who presented with a late-onset seroma in order to raise awareness for BIA-ALCL also in men after esthetic chest surgery with silicone pectoral implants. The patient had undergone augmentation of the pectoralis muscle with implants for esthetic reasons 9 years before. First cytological specimens showed no malignancy. A repeated cytological assessment after 6 weeks from recurring seroma showed characteristic CD30+ T-cell clones. Surgery with complete bilateral capsulectomy and implant removal was performed. Due to the early-stage ALCL being limited only to the capsule and no evidence of systemic disease, adjuvant systemic treatment was not considered necessary. Conclusion: Any persisting late-onset seroma also in male patients with pectoral implants should raise suspicion of ALCL as differential diagnosis and should be assessed with cytological examination.

The Problem of Diagnostic Criteria of Breast Implant Illness in Women After Breast Reconstruction: Review and Discussion of a Case.

INTRODUCTION: There has been a rising trend in the use of silicone breast implants for breast reconstructions after breast cancer treatment, as well as in the aesthetic breast procedures. A cluster of non-specific symptoms related to the presence of silicone implant has been called breast implant illness (BII). However, there are no strict criteria of BII which would specifically define this term. The increasing interest in BII among patients and physicians urges verifying own cases of "on-demand" explantations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this paper, we discussed a case of a patient with initial BII diagnosis, after breast reconstruction, and reviewed the literature on the BII symptoms and aetiology. A decision for aesthetic revision, not explantation, was made as the diagnosis of BII was questioned, and somatisation due to dissatisfaction with the aesthetic result of breast reconstruction was diagnosed. RESULTS: Improving aesthetics by implant exchange and contralateral mastopexy caused a full recovery from patient's symptoms. CONCLUSION: Based on our case, we point on the fact that BII diagnosis in patients after breast reconstruction is challenging. We suggest that while considering such a diagnosis and further proceedings, e.g. explantation, especially in patients after breast reconstruction, some exclusion criteria should be considered. Dissatisfaction with the result of the surgery can also lead to somatisation and the presence of real clinical symptoms, which should not be confused with the possible autoimmune reaction to silicone particles. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Iatrogenic Cerebrospinal Fluid Breast Augmentation: Rare Complication of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts and Management Strategies.

BACKGROUND: Ventriculoperitoneal shunt is one of the most common neurosurgical procedures in the treatment of hydrocephalus. There are reports of migration of the distal catheter to the breast pocket where cerebrospinal fluid then collects and can develop into a pseudocyst. There exist case reports in the literature of patients with prior breast augmentation who present with distal catheter migration from the peritoneal space into the breast tissue. We present a case series of 3 patients with preexisting breast augmentation who returned with unilateral breast enlargement after ventriculoperitoneal shunt. In all 3 patients, the distal catheter migrated out of the peritoneal space and was found to be coiled around the breast prosthesis. Additionally, we offer recommendations for managing these complications and a review of the literature. METHODS: We performed a systematic review without meta-analysis of studies involving management of shunt migration in the setting of preexisting breast implants. We present a case series of 3 patients whom we treated with breast cerebrospinal pseudocyst after migration of the distal catheter into the breast tissue. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies, dating from 2002 to 2022, met our inclusion and exclusion criteria and were selected for full review. Catheter migration occurred between 2 weeks and 9 months of initial shunt placement. All patients presented with unilateral breast enlargement and cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst formation. All patients underwent revision shunt surgery. Surgical treatment strategies used included reimplantation of the distal catheter into the pleural space or ipsilateral or contralateral peritoneal space or complete removal of the entire shunt system. CONCLUSIONS: Breast-related ventriculoperitoneal shunt complication is a rare entity that is increasingly seen as more patients receive breast augmentation. Breast-related shunt complications most commonly present with cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst formation in the breast. It is important for neurosurgeons to be aware of an underlying breast implant before placing a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. For patients who have migration of the distal catheter into the breast, a protocol for managing these situations should be followed to ensure no shunt infection and avoidance of future catheter migration complications with subsequent shunt revisions.

[Breast implant removal and simultaneous aesthetic optimization : Possibilities, technical considerations and outcome analysis]. / Brustimplantatentfernung und simultane ästhetische Optimierung : Möglichkeiten, technische Überlegungen und Ergebnisanalyse.

BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation is currently the leading aesthetic surgical procedure worldwide. Thus, there is a high prevalence of women with breast implants demanding serious know-how and expertise concerning long-term complication management. Breast implant carriers can suffer from problems and pathologies making implant removal the best solution. The authors of this article have also been confronted more and more with the unspecified complex of symptoms named breast implant disease (BID), also called breast implant illness (BII). The treatment of choice for BID is implant removal. OBJECTIVE: Analysis of problems and solutions regarding implant removal. Specific patient analysis according to patients' breast and body configuration. Technical considerations for surgery and preoperative planning. Evaluation of the authors' techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Evaluation of all patients over a period of 3 years requesting implant removal after esthetic augmentation mammoplasty at the authors' department. All patients were treated according to their specific demands regarding breast shape after implant removal. They either received additional mastopexy, lipofilling or both or simple implant removal without further intervention. Demographic, implant-specific, perioperative and postoperative data have been evaluated for all patients. Additionally, all patients were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding satisfaction and outcome. RESULTS: We observed a trend for more satisfied patients with less invasive procedures (simple implant removal or simultaneous lipofilling vs. explantation and mastopexy ± lipofilling, 1.8 vs. 2.0 or 2.6, p = 0.198). Patients' average scoring was better if they suffered from an implant rupture (1.55 vs. 2.17, p = 0.053). Overall, a high patient satisfaction has been observed for all procedures. CONCLUSION: Breast implant carriers can suffer from problems and pathologies making implant removal the best solution. Exactly these patients, consulting their doctor for those problems and questions seem to profit from implant removal. Simultaneous lipofilling and mastopexy of the breast are good options to nevertheless generate an esthetically pleasing result.

Updated trends of breast implant surgeries: An Israeli analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Breast augmentation remains one of the most prevalent procedures in plastic surgery. While most patients experience high satisfaction with the outcomes, a subset may encounter various complications or dissatisfaction with achieved results necessitating subsequent surgical intervention including implant removal or exchange. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected information from three pivotal private medical centers in Israel where a considerable number of breast surgeries are performed. We examined the number of breast augmentations, implant exchange and implant removal surgeries with or without breast lift that were performed on a biannual basis for each center for the period 2018-2022. Trends in surgery types were analyzed and compared to registries in other countries. RESULTS: Between the years 2018 and 2022, 20,075 surgeries were done in three main private medical centers in Israel. Data show a gradual increase in implant removal surgeries from 2018 (n = 80, 2.9%) to 2019 (n = 269, 9.9%), followed by a significant increase in 2020 (n = 1436, 27.3%), and a gradual decline between 2021 (n = 1019, 22.8%) and 2022 (n = 916, 18.5%). The overall number of breast implant insertion procedures (breast augmentation procedures and exchange procedures) was 2659 in 2018 (97%), 2424 in 2019 (90.0%), 3816 in 2020 (72.6%), 3437 in 2021 (77.1%), and 4019 in 2022 (81.4%). SUMMARY: We present updated trends in breast implant surgeries in Israel. 2020 was a key year in which the rate of explantations was the highest, and the percentage rate of implantations was the lowest and a year in which the trend changed. These patterns partly align with trends seen in other countries worldwide.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Breast Implant Evaluation: 2023 Update.

This document discusses the appropriate initial imaging in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with breast implants. For asymptomatic patients with saline implants, no imaging is recommended. If concern for rupture exists, ultrasound is usually appropriate though saline rupture is often clinically evident. The FDA recently recommended patients have an initial ultrasound or MRI examination 5 to 6 years after initial silicone implant surgery and then every 2 to 3 years thereafter. In a patient with unexplained axillary adenopathy with current or prior silicone breast implants, ultrasound and/or mammography are usually appropriate, depending on age. In a patient with concern for silicone implant rupture, ultrasound or MRI without contrast is usually appropriate. In the setting of a patient with breast implants and possible implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma, ultrasound is usually appropriate as the initial imaging. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Impact of the withdrawal of macrotextured implant on reconstruction practices.

INTRODUCTION: On 22 November 2018, the French Society for Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery recommended that Allergan® macrotextured breast implants be recalled, a decision endorsed by the French national health products safety agency (ANSM) on 2nd April 2019. At the Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Center (CGFL) in Dijon, we decided to stop using macrotextured implants as of November 2018 in favor of smooth implants. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of the recall of macrotextured implants on breast reconstruction surgical practices and their complications. METHODS: This is a single-centre, retrospective study performed at the CGFL in Dijon, France. Reconstruction techniques and complications were compared between two periods, i.e. before the recall of macrotextured breast implants (period 1: 1st September 2017-November 22, 2018) and after the recall (period 2: 23 November 2018-31st March 2020). All patients who underwent breast reconstruction for the first time were included. RESULTS: Data were collected from 168 reconstructions in period 2, and 159 in period 2. The rate of use of breast implants during reconstructions decreased significantly in period 2 (53.6% vs. 23.9%; P<0.001). The rate of autologous reconstructions increased significantly for muscle sparing latissimus dorsi (2.4% vs. 12.6%; P<0.001) and exclusive fat grafting (9.5% vs. 21.5%; P<0.01). Clavien-Dindo Stage IIIb complications decreased in period 2 (10% vs. 18.4%; P=0.04). CONCLUSION: Since the recall of macrotextured breast implants, the reconstruction rate has decreased in our centre in favor of autologous techniques with lower complication rates.

Ruptured breast implant removal because of patient anxiety in the absence of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma.

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) has been regarded as a long-term problem after silicone breast implantations. We report a case in which BIA-ALCL and breast cancer were not detected preoperatively, with subsequent removal of a ruptured breast implant. A 52-year-old woman had silicone breast implants on both sides for breast augmentation 15 years ago. Right axillary lymphadenopathy and intracapsular ruptures were noted by magnetic resonance imaging. Right axillary lymph node biopsy was performed at our department of breast surgery. Flow cytometry for BIA-ALCL was also performed using the exudate around the implant. The results were negative for breast cancer and BIA-ALCL. However, taking into consideration exacerbation of breast implant rupture and the patient's anxiety about BIA-ALCL, ruptured bilateral implants were removed by total capsulectomy. The postoperative course was uneventful 1 year after the operation, and her anxiety was dispelled despite her breast deformity. Appropriate explantation and periodic examination may be required to prevent excessive anxiety.

Safe Reduction of Intermammary Distance in Implant Breast Augmentation Without Fat Grafting.

BACKGROUND: Over the latest 15 years, breast augmentation with implant has been progressively refined technically and artistically. However, little attention is usually given to the intermammary space. The aim of this article is to report author's experience and technique in the safe reduction of the intermammary space in breast augmentation with implants without fat grafting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 2019 to July 2021, 62 consecutive patients undergoing cosmetic breast enhancement with implant and requesting a reduction of the intermammary space were retrospectively evaluated. Preoperatively, breast features were registered for all patients. Preoperative intermammary distance ranged from 2.3 to 7 cm (5.4 ± 0.74). RESULTS: The average follow-up time was 20 months (range 12 to 36 months). All implants were anatomical silicon-gel filled implants with micropolyurethane foam shell. No major early and late complications were experienced. The outcomes were graded as excellent in 45 breasts (72.6 %), very good in 15 (24.2%), good in the two cases (3.2%) with minor delayed wound healing (less than 1 cm) which solved conservatively within 1 month. Patients' satisfaction was high to very high. Postoperative intermammary distance was reduced in all cases and ranged from 1 to 4.5 (mean 2.6 ± 0.52 cm) CONCLUSION: The intermammary distance can be safely reduced with implant only in all cases who seek it, both via submuscular and via subfascial approach by a precise medial pocket dissection and implantation of micropolyurethane foam-coated implant, which guarantee device's stability during the healing process avoiding malposition. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Implant-based breast surgery and capsular formation: when, how and why?-a narrative review.

Background and Objective: Implant-based breast surgery is a common procedure for both reconstructive and aesthetic purposes. Breast implants, like any foreign object, trigger the formation of a capsule around them. While generally harmless, the capsule can undergo fibrotic changes leading to capsular contracture, which can negatively impact surgical outcomes and patient well-being. Additionally, rare but serious complications, such as breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) and capsule-associated squamous cell carcinoma, have been reported. This paper aims to review the physiology of capsular formation, identify factors contributing to capsule-related pathologies, and discuss their clinical implications. Methods: A review of relevant literature was conducted by searching databases for articles published between inception and September 2022. The search included but not limited to terms such as "capsular formation" and "capsular contracture". Selected articles were critically analyzed to address the objectives of this review. Key Content and Findings: Capsular formation involves interactions between the implant surface, surrounding tissues, and the immune system. Factors influencing pathological changes in the capsule include genetic predisposition, bacterial contamination, implant characteristics, and surgical techniques. Capsular contracture, characterized by tissue hardening, pain, and implant distortion, remains the most common complication. Rare but life-threatening conditions, such as BIA-ALCL and capsule-associated squamous cell carcinoma, necessitate vigilant monitoring and early detection. Conclusions: Understanding the physiology of capsular formation and its associated pathologies is crucial for healthcare providers involved in implant-based breast surgery. Efforts should focus on minimizing the risk of capsular contracture through improved implant materials, surgical techniques, and infection prevention. The emergence of BIA-ALCL and capsule-associated squamous cell carcinoma underscores the importance of long-term surveillance and prompt diagnosis. Further research is needed to uncover underlying mechanisms and develop preventive measures and treatments for these complications. Enhancing our knowledge and clinical management of capsular formation will lead to safer and more successful outcomes in implant-based breast surgery.

The influence of personality on patient-reported outcomes in women undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Despite the lack of hard evidence for causality, some women attribute their systemic complaints to their silicone breast implants. Personality and psychological distress are associated with the development of medically unexplained symptoms. It could be hypothesized that these psychological factors are related to the development of breast implant illness (BII). In a previous study, we found a relationship between personality traits and BII-related complaints in patients with cosmetic breast implants. This association may also exist in patients with implant-based breast reconstruction. OBJECTIVES: This cross-sectional study evaluated the association between personality, self-reported health complaints, and health- and breast-related quality of life (QoL) in women with implant-based breast reconstruction. METHODS: Women who underwent breast reconstruction between January 2015 and December 2018 in either the Maastricht University Medical Center or Zuyderland Medical Center were invited to participate in this study. Participants were asked to complete a physical complaint score form and the BREAST-Q, SF-36, and EPQ-RSS questionnaires through an online survey. The association between outcomes was analyzed with multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: A total of 118 women completed the questionnaires. Social desirability and extroversion were predominant personality traits. Neuroticism levels were comparable with normative data. Neuroticism correlated significantly with health status and breast-related QoL. Health-related QoL had the strongest correlation with neuroticism (ß = -2.93, ß = -3.41, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that personality, and neuroticism in particular, may contribute to the development of medically unexplained complaints in women with implant-based reconstruction. The influence of personality on BII needs to be further investigated in large prospective studies.

False-positive diagnoses of damaged breast implants on imaging: a report of two cases.

Background: Silicone breast implants (SBIs), used in breast reconstruction, are durable and resistant to breakage and internal gel leakage. However, regular imaging examinations are crucial, as symptoms may not be apparent even if the implant ruptures. There are several known imaging findings that suggest SBI failure. Although artifacts such as moisture and air bubbles or substances similar to the gel extending outside the shell may appear on imaging, no reports have demonstrated false-positive diagnoses of damaged SBIs in detail. Hence, we present two cases in which failure was suspected based on the imaging results but not confirmed. Case Description: In case 1, at the 4-year follow-up after implant-based breast reconstruction, ultrasonography revealed a stepladder sign, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed the salad oil sign. Although SBI failure was suggested, intraoperative examination revealed only a small amount of fluid retention within the capsule and no SBI fractures. Consequently, the imaging results were proved to be artifacts. In case 2, at the 7-year follow-up after implant-based breast reconstruction, ultrasonography revealed a subcapsular line sign, and MRI confirmed a keyhole sign. Although SBI failure was suggested, intraoperative examination revealed no implant fractures. Hematogenous serous effusion was found within the capsule, and blood clots and a large amount of fibrinous mass were found deposited at the bottom of the capsule. These findings caused false-positive diagnoses on imaging. Conclusions: In cases of suspected fractures, patients may opt for either observation or surgical removal, or replacement of the implant. When choosing the latter, it is important to inform patients of the possibility of an unbroken implant.